LIVE PULSE
5.0 Anthropic CEO Amodei calls for slower AI development and shared safety rules11 src2.7 Agility Robotics unveils Digit 5 humanoid for warehouses and factories2 src2.5 Apple ships rebuilt Siri with Google Gemini, but not in the EU2 src2.2 Siri AI in macOS 27 Golden Gate: FAQ, Germany availability, privacy questions2 src1.8 Sam Altman says OpenAI will not go public in 2026, citing AI safety concerns5 src1.4 OpenAI contractors review real ChatGPT conversations to rate responses, report says2 src1.4 Anthropic data retention policy prompts firms to limit Claude use for sensitive work1 src1.4 VoiceCodeBench arXiv paper proposes benchmark for exact structured-token recovery in speech recognition1 src1.4 Arabic-Russian Parallel Corpus and LLM Benchmark for Scientific Text1 src1.4 Study Analyzes Self-Reported Limitations in NLP Research1 src5.0 Anthropic CEO Amodei calls for slower AI development and shared safety rules11 src2.7 Agility Robotics unveils Digit 5 humanoid for warehouses and factories2 src2.5 Apple ships rebuilt Siri with Google Gemini, but not in the EU2 src2.2 Siri AI in macOS 27 Golden Gate: FAQ, Germany availability, privacy questions2 src1.8 Sam Altman says OpenAI will not go public in 2026, citing AI safety concerns5 src1.4 OpenAI contractors review real ChatGPT conversations to rate responses, report says2 src1.4 Anthropic data retention policy prompts firms to limit Claude use for sensitive work1 src1.4 VoiceCodeBench arXiv paper proposes benchmark for exact structured-token recovery in speech recognition1 src1.4 Arabic-Russian Parallel Corpus and LLM Benchmark for Scientific Text1 src1.4 Study Analyzes Self-Reported Limitations in NLP Research1 src
HEATPULSEAI MAGAZINES
FLIP · FOLLOW · SAVE

#citations

5 curated events
papersTODAY 04:00 UTC

CITECHOICE audit studies how document presentation shifts citation credit in agentic search

A new arXiv paper introduces CITECHOICE, a causal audit framework for studying citation allocation in multi-turn agentic search, where an answer engine cites only some of the retrieved sources that support the same claim. The study is built from 129 everyday queries and examines how the way documents are presented redistributes credit among sources.

papersTODAY 04:00 UTC

Claim-Level Evaluation of Verbatim Citations in Clinical Question Answering

A new arXiv paper addresses the problem that citations attached to LLM answers in clinical question answering usually reference whole documents, which makes verification slow for busy clinicians. The authors propose an evaluation approach that works at the level of individual claims, requiring verbatim citation support that can be checked directly. The stated goal is to make system outputs verifiable by construction rather than by trust.

papersTODAY 04:00 UTC

Study Measures Citation Attribution Across RAG Context Compression Methods

A new arXiv paper examines how context compression in retrieval-augmented generation affects citation attribution, not just answer quality. The authors benchmark reranking and extractive compression approaches under varying compression budgets to map what they call the attribution-compression frontier. The work suggests that evaluating answer accuracy alone misses important degradation in source attribution.

papersTODAY 04:00 UTC

Paper Examines Citation Laundering Attacks in Multi-Source RAG Systems

A new arXiv paper describes "citation laundering," where retrieval-augmented generation systems surface citations that appear legitimate but do not actually support the claims they are attached to, weakening the audit trail users rely on. The authors propose a counterfactual defense aimed at detecting and mitigating this manipulation across multiple retrieved sources. The work sits in the cs.CL area and is listed as a cross-list announcement.

papersTODAY 04:00 UTC

CiteGuard-RAG: A Validation-Centered System for Evidence-Grounded Question Answering

A new arXiv paper presents CiteGuard-RAG, a retrieval-augmented generation system built around validating answers rather than only retrieving supporting passages. The authors argue that fetching evidence does not by itself guarantee that responses are properly grounded, carry valid citations, or are refused when appropriate. The work proposes a validation-focused design intended to enforce those checks.