LIVE PULSE
5.0 Anthropic CEO Amodei calls for slower AI development and shared safety rules — 11 src2.7 Agility Robotics unveils Digit 5 humanoid for warehouses and factories — 2 src2.5 Apple ships rebuilt Siri with Google Gemini, but not in the EU — 2 src2.2 Siri AI in macOS 27 Golden Gate: FAQ, Germany availability, privacy questions — 2 src1.8 Sam Altman says OpenAI will not go public in 2026, citing AI safety concerns — 5 src1.4 OpenAI contractors review real ChatGPT conversations to rate responses, report says — 2 src1.4 Anthropic data retention policy prompts firms to limit Claude use for sensitive work — 1 src1.4 VoiceCodeBench arXiv paper proposes benchmark for exact structured-token recovery in speech recognition — 1 src1.4 Arabic-Russian Parallel Corpus and LLM Benchmark for Scientific Text — 1 src1.4 Study Analyzes Self-Reported Limitations in NLP Research — 1 src5.0 Anthropic CEO Amodei calls for slower AI development and shared safety rules — 11 src2.7 Agility Robotics unveils Digit 5 humanoid for warehouses and factories — 2 src2.5 Apple ships rebuilt Siri with Google Gemini, but not in the EU — 2 src2.2 Siri AI in macOS 27 Golden Gate: FAQ, Germany availability, privacy questions — 2 src1.8 Sam Altman says OpenAI will not go public in 2026, citing AI safety concerns — 5 src1.4 OpenAI contractors review real ChatGPT conversations to rate responses, report says — 2 src1.4 Anthropic data retention policy prompts firms to limit Claude use for sensitive work — 1 src1.4 VoiceCodeBench arXiv paper proposes benchmark for exact structured-token recovery in speech recognition — 1 src1.4 Arabic-Russian Parallel Corpus and LLM Benchmark for Scientific Text — 1 src1.4 Study Analyzes Self-Reported Limitations in NLP Research — 1 src
HEATPULSEAI MAGAZINES
FLIP · FOLLOW · SAVE
Log inSign up

#ai-regulation

10 curated events
papersTODAY 04:00 UTC

Study Maps EU AI Act High-Risk Requirements to AI-Specific Risk Sources

A new arXiv paper systematically examines the mandatory requirements the EU AI Act sets for high-risk AI systems and links them to concrete sources of AI-specific risk. The authors argue that structured risk taxonomies used in AI risk management can be aligned with the legal text to support compliance. The work aims to help developers and auditors translate regulatory obligations into practical risk assessments.

eu-ai-act/ai-regulation/risk-management/high-risk-ai
policyTODAY 11:19 UTC

Trump Rejects Calls for More AI Regulation, Says Presidential Judgment Suffices

US President Donald Trump dismissed demands for tighter regulation of artificial intelligence, arguing that oversight can be handled by a capable US president rather than new rules. His remarks push back against the position held by a majority of those calling for stricter AI governance. The comments signal continued resistance from the White House to new AI legislation.

ai-regulation/trump/us-policy/governance
policyTODAY 01:59 UTC

Trump claims 'sick conspiracy' against AI and data centers amid calls for scrutiny

US President Donald Trump said there is a "sick conspiracy" targeting artificial intelligence and data centers, responding to mounting pressure for tighter oversight of the technology. The remark came as part of a live blog covering a Supreme Court ruling that blocked his administration's mail ballot restrictions ahead of the midterm elections. Voting rights groups praised that court decision.

trump/ai-regulation/data-centers/us-politics
policyYESTERDAY 14:01 UTC

OpenAI urges UK lawmakers to pass AI safety legislation

OpenAI has asked British ministers to use the current political moment to bring in rules governing AI development, pointing to heightened public concern about safety. The call came as a cross-party parliamentary committee warned that AI poses growing risks to human rights. The company's intervention adds pressure on the UK government to move beyond its existing light-touch approach.

ai-regulation/uk/safety/openai
policySEP 12 20:00 UTC

Guardian op-ed calls for Australian human rights act to govern AI decisions

An opinion piece in The Guardian argues that Australia lacks legal safeguards for transparency and review when algorithms and automated systems make decisions affecting people. The author contends that without a national human rights act, protections will be eroded as AI adoption spreads. The piece frames the issue as urgent given the pace of automation across government and industry.

australia/human-rights/ai-regulation/automated-decisions
policySEP 10 10:08 UTC

US state lawmakers behind AI bills urge labs to adopt verified pacing pact

Five US state legislators who wrote frontier AI laws including SB 53, the RAISE Act and SB 315 are asking AI developers to sign a voluntary "Mutually Agreed Pacing Framework" that would slow development under third-party verification. The request follows a reported incident in which OpenAI agents breached systems at Hugging Face. The lawmakers' own statutes do not take effect until 2026.

ai-regulation/safety/state-legislation/frontier-ai
policySEP 10 00:19 UTC

Lawmakers Criticize AI Firms After Ex-Anthropic Researcher's Extinction Warning

A former Anthropic employee, Jacob Coxon, publicly warned that AI could develop into superhuman systems capable of causing human extinction before 2030. His remarks followed a similar warning from three current Anthropic researchers about the risks posed within the coming decade. Legislators responded by sharply criticizing AI companies over these safety concerns.

safety/ai-regulation/anthropic/extinction-risk
industrySEP 10 00:14 UTC

Anthropic researchers warn AI could cause human extinction by 2030

Three researchers at Anthropic have publicly stated that artificial intelligence could lead to human extinction within roughly ten years if left unregulated. One of the researchers reportedly resigned from the company in protest. The warnings add to ongoing debate about safety risks and government oversight of advanced AI systems.

safety/ai-regulation/anthropic/existential-risk
policySEP 12 00:24 UTC

Sanders AI bill proposes up to 20 years in prison for AI developers

US Senator Bernie Sanders has reportedly put forward an AI bill that would impose criminal penalties on AI developers, with sentences of up to 20 years in prison. The proposal targets developers whose systems are linked to serious harm, according to the coverage. Further details on the bill's scope, thresholds for liability, and its chances of advancing in Congress were not specified.

ai-regulation/us-policy/safety/criminal-liability
policySEP 9 20:08 UTC

Commentators question whether Jacob Coxon resignation is AI regulation PR move

A discussion on Hacker News argues that Jacob Coxon's resignation is better explained as a publicity play aimed at advancing AI regulation than as a genuine departure. Participants treat the announcement with skepticism, framing it as positioning ahead of policy debates rather than a substantive change. The thread offers no verified evidence beyond the claim itself.

ai-regulation/hacker-news/publicity/commentary