LIVE PULSE
5.0 Anthropic CEO Amodei calls for slower AI development and shared safety rules11 src2.7 Agility Robotics unveils Digit 5 humanoid for warehouses and factories2 src2.5 Apple ships rebuilt Siri with Google Gemini, but not in the EU2 src2.2 Siri AI in macOS 27 Golden Gate: FAQ, Germany availability, privacy questions2 src1.7 Sam Altman says OpenAI will not go public in 2026, citing AI safety concerns5 src1.4 OpenAI contractors review real ChatGPT conversations to rate responses, report says2 src1.3 Anthropic data retention policy prompts firms to limit Claude use for sensitive work1 src1.3 Study traces LLM hallucinations to competing latent associations1 src1.3 Arabic-Russian Parallel Corpus and LLM Benchmark for Scientific Text1 src1.3 Study Analyzes Self-Reported Limitations in NLP Research1 src5.0 Anthropic CEO Amodei calls for slower AI development and shared safety rules11 src2.7 Agility Robotics unveils Digit 5 humanoid for warehouses and factories2 src2.5 Apple ships rebuilt Siri with Google Gemini, but not in the EU2 src2.2 Siri AI in macOS 27 Golden Gate: FAQ, Germany availability, privacy questions2 src1.7 Sam Altman says OpenAI will not go public in 2026, citing AI safety concerns5 src1.4 OpenAI contractors review real ChatGPT conversations to rate responses, report says2 src1.3 Anthropic data retention policy prompts firms to limit Claude use for sensitive work1 src1.3 Study traces LLM hallucinations to competing latent associations1 src1.3 Arabic-Russian Parallel Corpus and LLM Benchmark for Scientific Text1 src1.3 Study Analyzes Self-Reported Limitations in NLP Research1 src
HEATPULSEAI MAGAZINES
FLIP · FOLLOW · SAVE

tool-using-ai-agents

topic1 events
papersTODAY 04:00 UTC

Search APIs Evaluated as Decision Surfaces for Tool-Using AI Agents

A new arXiv paper examines how the ranked snippets, URLs, and metadata returned by search APIs shape the choices made by tool-using AI agents, such as whether to answer, search again, or open a page. The authors evaluate these interfaces as decision surfaces using a fixed set of 100 questions drawn from the 254-question SealQA-Hard benchmark. The work suggests that agents can reach similar accuracy while relying on differing amounts or quality of supporting evidence.