arXiv Paper Proposes Reward-Based Outcome Evaluation for Grammatical Error Correction
A new arXiv preprint argues that grammatical error correction systems are typically judged by how closely their edits or outputs match reference corrections, which can unfairly penalize valid alternative rewrites. The author proposes evaluating GEC by the outcome instead, using reward-based scoring that judges whether the resulting text is fluent and correct rather than counting edits. This reduces reliance on gold references and aims to better reflect real-world usefulness.