LIVE PULSE
4.7 Anthropic CEO Amodei calls for slower AI development and shared safety rules — 11 src2.6 Agility Robotics unveils Digit 5 humanoid for warehouses and factories — 2 src2.4 Apple ships rebuilt Siri with Google Gemini, but not in the EU — 2 src2.1 Siri AI in macOS 27 Golden Gate: FAQ, Germany availability, privacy questions — 2 src1.6 Sam Altman says OpenAI will not go public in 2026, citing AI safety concerns — 5 src1.3 OpenAI contractors review real ChatGPT conversations to rate responses, report says — 2 src1.3 Anthropic data retention policy prompts firms to limit Claude use for sensitive work — 1 src1.3 Paper Shows TF-IDF and BM25 Are Exact KL Divergences — 1 src1.3 Arabic-Russian Parallel Corpus and LLM Benchmark for Scientific Text — 1 src1.3 LoRA Study Maps Asymmetric Transfer Across Tasks and Languages — 1 src4.7 Anthropic CEO Amodei calls for slower AI development and shared safety rules — 11 src2.6 Agility Robotics unveils Digit 5 humanoid for warehouses and factories — 2 src2.4 Apple ships rebuilt Siri with Google Gemini, but not in the EU — 2 src2.1 Siri AI in macOS 27 Golden Gate: FAQ, Germany availability, privacy questions — 2 src1.6 Sam Altman says OpenAI will not go public in 2026, citing AI safety concerns — 5 src1.3 OpenAI contractors review real ChatGPT conversations to rate responses, report says — 2 src1.3 Anthropic data retention policy prompts firms to limit Claude use for sensitive work — 1 src1.3 Paper Shows TF-IDF and BM25 Are Exact KL Divergences — 1 src1.3 Arabic-Russian Parallel Corpus and LLM Benchmark for Scientific Text — 1 src1.3 LoRA Study Maps Asymmetric Transfer Across Tasks and Languages — 1 src
HEATPULSEAI MAGAZINES
FLIP · FOLLOW · SAVE
Log inSign up

online deliberation

topic1 events
papersSEP 12 04:00 UTC

arXiv paper proposes collective-centric evaluation of preference inference for participatory democracy

A new arXiv preprint argues that evaluation of preference inference methods for online deliberation platforms should focus on collective outcomes rather than individual accuracy. It examines platforms like Polis and Remesh, which host deliberation among thousands of participants, and notes that at such scale people cannot read every submitted opinion. The work proposes a collective-centric evaluation framework for these systems.

preference-inference/participatory-democracy/evaluation/arxiv