LIVE PULSE
4.8 Anthropic CEO Amodei calls for slower AI development and shared safety rules — 11 src2.6 Agility Robotics unveils Digit 5 humanoid for warehouses and factories — 2 src2.4 Apple ships rebuilt Siri with Google Gemini, but not in the EU — 2 src2.1 Siri AI in macOS 27 Golden Gate: FAQ, Germany availability, privacy questions — 2 src1.7 Sam Altman says OpenAI will not go public in 2026, citing AI safety concerns — 5 src1.4 OpenAI contractors review real ChatGPT conversations to rate responses, report says — 2 src1.3 Anthropic data retention policy prompts firms to limit Claude use for sensitive work — 1 src1.3 Paper Examines How First Query Shapes Agentic Deep Search — 1 src1.3 Conformance-Driven Iterative Refinement for Natural-Language to SysMLv2 Translation — 1 src1.3 Neural Operators for Nonlinear Functionals on RKHS — 1 src4.8 Anthropic CEO Amodei calls for slower AI development and shared safety rules — 11 src2.6 Agility Robotics unveils Digit 5 humanoid for warehouses and factories — 2 src2.4 Apple ships rebuilt Siri with Google Gemini, but not in the EU — 2 src2.1 Siri AI in macOS 27 Golden Gate: FAQ, Germany availability, privacy questions — 2 src1.7 Sam Altman says OpenAI will not go public in 2026, citing AI safety concerns — 5 src1.4 OpenAI contractors review real ChatGPT conversations to rate responses, report says — 2 src1.3 Anthropic data retention policy prompts firms to limit Claude use for sensitive work — 1 src1.3 Paper Examines How First Query Shapes Agentic Deep Search — 1 src1.3 Conformance-Driven Iterative Refinement for Natural-Language to SysMLv2 Translation — 1 src1.3 Neural Operators for Nonlinear Functionals on RKHS — 1 src
HEATPULSEAI MAGAZINES
FLIP · FOLLOW · SAVE
Log inSign up

Hugo Vergnes

person1 events
tipsSEP 10 02:04 UTC

Blog Post Details Training a 3.8B LLM to 0.384 CORE for $998

A write-up by Hugo Vergnes describes training a 3.8-billion-parameter language model that reached a 0.384 score on the CORE benchmark for roughly $998 in compute costs. The post walks through the data, hardware, and training choices behind that result. It appears aimed at readers interested in low-budget, reproducible model training.

training/benchmarks/llm/cost-efficiency