LIVE PULSE
5.0 Anthropic CEO Amodei calls for slower AI development and shared safety rules — 11 src2.7 Agility Robotics unveils Digit 5 humanoid for warehouses and factories — 2 src2.5 Apple ships rebuilt Siri with Google Gemini, but not in the EU — 2 src2.2 Siri AI in macOS 27 Golden Gate: FAQ, Germany availability, privacy questions — 2 src1.7 Sam Altman says OpenAI will not go public in 2026, citing AI safety concerns — 5 src1.4 OpenAI contractors review real ChatGPT conversations to rate responses, report says — 2 src1.3 Anthropic data retention policy prompts firms to limit Claude use for sensitive work — 1 src1.3 Study traces LLM hallucinations to competing latent associations — 1 src1.3 Arabic-Russian Parallel Corpus and LLM Benchmark for Scientific Text — 1 src1.3 Study Analyzes Self-Reported Limitations in NLP Research — 1 src5.0 Anthropic CEO Amodei calls for slower AI development and shared safety rules — 11 src2.7 Agility Robotics unveils Digit 5 humanoid for warehouses and factories — 2 src2.5 Apple ships rebuilt Siri with Google Gemini, but not in the EU — 2 src2.2 Siri AI in macOS 27 Golden Gate: FAQ, Germany availability, privacy questions — 2 src1.7 Sam Altman says OpenAI will not go public in 2026, citing AI safety concerns — 5 src1.4 OpenAI contractors review real ChatGPT conversations to rate responses, report says — 2 src1.3 Anthropic data retention policy prompts firms to limit Claude use for sensitive work — 1 src1.3 Study traces LLM hallucinations to competing latent associations — 1 src1.3 Arabic-Russian Parallel Corpus and LLM Benchmark for Scientific Text — 1 src1.3 Study Analyzes Self-Reported Limitations in NLP Research — 1 src
HEATPULSEAI MAGAZINES
FLIP · FOLLOW · SAVE
Log inSign up

ai-research-automation

topic1 events
papersTODAY 04:00 UTC

AppliedScientist: Closed-Loop AI System Refines Papers via Iterative Reviewing

Researchers introduce AppliedScientist, a system that joins AI-generated peer review with automated revision in a closed loop. Instead of judging review quality only by how good the critique sounds, the work measures whether acting on that feedback actually improves the paper. The approach targets a gap in automated reviewing, where feedback is often evaluated in isolation from its effect on the manuscript.

agents/peer-review/automation/research