LIVE PULSE
4.9 Anthropic CEO Amodei calls for slower AI development and shared safety rules11 src2.6 Agility Robotics unveils Digit 5 humanoid for warehouses and factories2 src2.4 Apple ships rebuilt Siri with Google Gemini, but not in the EU2 src2.2 Siri AI in macOS 27 Golden Gate: FAQ, Germany availability, privacy questions2 src1.7 Sam Altman says OpenAI will not go public in 2026, citing AI safety concerns5 src1.4 OpenAI contractors review real ChatGPT conversations to rate responses, report says2 src1.3 Anthropic data retention policy prompts firms to limit Claude use for sensitive work1 src1.3 CoMem Paper Proposes Shared and Individual Memory Design for LLM Multi-Agent Systems1 src1.3 Paper proposes evolving context parameterization for large language models1 src1.3 Fine-Tuning Vision-Language Models with Listener Gaze for Referring Expressions1 src4.9 Anthropic CEO Amodei calls for slower AI development and shared safety rules11 src2.6 Agility Robotics unveils Digit 5 humanoid for warehouses and factories2 src2.4 Apple ships rebuilt Siri with Google Gemini, but not in the EU2 src2.2 Siri AI in macOS 27 Golden Gate: FAQ, Germany availability, privacy questions2 src1.7 Sam Altman says OpenAI will not go public in 2026, citing AI safety concerns5 src1.4 OpenAI contractors review real ChatGPT conversations to rate responses, report says2 src1.3 Anthropic data retention policy prompts firms to limit Claude use for sensitive work1 src1.3 CoMem Paper Proposes Shared and Individual Memory Design for LLM Multi-Agent Systems1 src1.3 Paper proposes evolving context parameterization for large language models1 src1.3 Fine-Tuning Vision-Language Models with Listener Gaze for Referring Expressions1 src
HEATPULSEAI MAGAZINES
FLIP · FOLLOW · SAVE

AI planning

topic2 events
papersSEP 10 04:00 UTC

Researchers propose learned chain-of-thought verification to improve LLM reasoning

A new preprint on arXiv (2603.03538) introduces an approach in which a learned verifier checks the step-by-step reasoning chains produced by large language models, with the goal of catching mistakes in complex reasoning and planning tasks. The authors argue that adding this verification stage makes model outputs more reliable despite the inherent error-proneness of LLM-generated reasoning.

papersSEP 10 04:00 UTC

Researchers propose grounded evaluation and repair for LLM-generated PDDL planning problems

A new arXiv paper examines how large language models convert natural-language planning descriptions into PDDL problem instances, arguing that common checks like syntactic validity or planner success can overstate actual quality. The authors introduce an evaluation and repair framework that grounds assessment more firmly in the underlying planning task to better catch and fix flawed outputs.